| Time | Speaker | Text |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00:06.73 | Kenneth Henry | Okay, Chair Feller, I'll hand it over to you. ranked public. |
| 00:00:16.69 | Kristina Feller | Thank you so much, Maria. And good evening, everybody. Welcome to the regular Planning Commission hearing for Wednesday, June 1st. I'd like to ask our Interim Community Development Director, Dan Hortert, to please take the roll call and provide any instruction on our governor's order for virtual hearings. |
| 00:00:39.62 | Dan | Chair Fowler. Good evening, Chair and Planning Commissioners. This meeting is being held pursuant to Government Code Section 54953, Subsection E, And in light of the declared state of emergency, the regular meeting of the planning commission on June 1st, 2022 will be conducted telephonically through Zoom and broadcast live on the city's website. With that, would you like me to do a call to order? |
| 00:01:08.63 | Kristina Feller | Please do. |
| 00:01:10.62 | Dan | Commissioner Graff. President. Commissioner Luxembourg? President. COMMISSIONER SON. I'm not sure. Vice Chair Juniors? I'm not sure. Chair Feller. |
| 00:01:22.73 | Kristina Feller | I WANT TO TAKE A LOOK AT THE |
| 00:01:23.56 | Dan | We have a forum. |
| 00:01:25.15 | Kristina Feller | Terrific. Thank you so much. Our next order of business is item number two, which is approval of the agenda. Do I have any comments from commission or a motion to approve? |
| 00:01:39.85 | Jeffery Luxenberg | I do. is for the agenda. |
| 00:01:43.49 | Kristina Feller | Yes. |
| 00:01:44.42 | Jeffery Luxenberg | Yeah, so moved. |
| 00:01:46.22 | Kristina Feller | THE END OF THE |
| 00:01:47.31 | Jeffery Luxenberg | Thank you. Welcome. |
| 00:01:49.08 | Kristina Feller | Right. Thank you. Dan, could you take roll call? |
| 00:01:51.69 | Dan | Commissioner Graff? Yeah. Commissioner Luxembourg? Yes. Commissioner Saad. Yeah. Vice Chair Junius. Peace. Chair Feller. |
| 00:02:02.09 | Kristina Feller | Yes. |
| 00:02:03.57 | Dan | We have unanimous. |
| 00:02:05.50 | Kristina Feller | Great, thank you very much. Moving along to item number three, this is public comments for items not on the agenda this evening. And Dan, could I ask that you please provide some instruction to the public on how to raise our hand in the Zoom application to make public comment. or on their cell phone. |
| 00:02:24.28 | Dan | Yes, thank you, Chair. This is the time for the planning commission to hear from citizens regarding matters that are not on the agenda. except in very limited situations, state law precludes the planning commission taking action on or engaging in discussions concerning items of business that are not on the agenda. However, The planning commission may refer matters not on the agenda to staff or direct the subject be agendized at a future meeting. Video or audio public comment participation is limited to three minutes per speaker. If you would like to make a comment, please raise your hand in the Zoom application and you will be called upon when it is your time to speak. To raise your hand from the phone, press star nine. And each speaker will be notified when the time has elapsed. |
| 00:03:12.79 | Kristina Feller | Great, thank you so much. I'm just looking for raised hands in the audience. And while I'm doing that, I just want to make note that we have received One written public comment from a Sue White regarding a project up on Sausalito Boulevard. this matter has come up in front of the planning commission before, and I would ask that staff please communicate directly with the whites and coordinate accordingly. |
| 00:03:39.86 | Dan | I have, I have, and I have a third party arborist. This is about an arborist, third party arborist review. Um, prepared to meet with McNair Arborist as well as doing a site visit and potentially seeing Ms. White out there as well. |
| 00:03:57.60 | Kristina Feller | Terrific. Thank you so much, Dan, for our running point on that. I am not seeing any hands from the public. So I'm going to go ahead and, close public comment and let's move on to the next item on our agenda which is communications. And I would like to ask this evening if staff could communicate out first. Dan, I'll hand this over to you to direct that accordingly. |
| 00:04:24.48 | Dan | Um, Thank you, Chair. members of the commission. And it was brought to the staff's attention about a project on 505 Johnson in which I sent I believe I sent code enforcement and building inspector out there. It was a job. It was a project that was approved. for a major zoning permit and the building plan and, you know, the building permit, was also approved and they commenced construction, I believe in March. but I will, Turn this over to Kenneth Henry, who has been out to the site a couple times. and give you some feedback on what he saw and kind of where we're at. |
| 00:05:05.60 | Kristina Feller | Right. Thank you. Welcome. Welcome Kenneth. |
| 00:05:15.51 | Kenneth Henry | Mr. Chair, I was able to make a few visits to the job site to determine the extent of the scope of the work. We have found that the plans do called for modifications to the roof system. And the plans also show that there are no additional foundations being constructed for livable space. They do have an exterior patio. that will be constructed and some decks that will move from one location to another. Dan had sent me out, the director had sent me out to investigate the The scope of the work in accordance with the approved set of plans to ensure that they were building accordingly. And my findings were that they are building per plan. that was approved by the city of Sausalito. Um, So that's what I know about the project. I did call the contractor to have a few conversations with them to understand and to ensure that my findings, as I shared with the director, were complete and accurate. And like I said, there is no, additional livable space being constructed on the outside. And, um, there's some modifications to the roof. But what I understand through the contractor is that with the neighboring property to the uphill side, there was lots of communication about what would make both property owners amicably satisfied with Yeah. the construction going on next door and then the construction and what the under construction is doing is that they are going to lower their system down to about 10 inches below where it currently is at. and they're going to extend some dormers at the same elevation. This made the neighbor behind the project on the uphill side. quite pleased and he gave his approval to the 505 Johnson property owner because he was getting more of a view and from the neighboring property, that's a pretty pretty exciting view to get more of the marina shot, not so much just the landscape of Tiburon in the background, but actually to get some marinas. That's what I understand about the project in my conversations with the builder and my review of the approved plans. |
| 00:08:03.37 | Kristina Feller | Thank you. Thank you, Kenneth. And thank you, Dan. I know this is a one-way communication. But my understanding was that there were some issues with the historic context. as well and that this was a ministerial approval this did not come in front of planning commission or hpc could you just confirm that for the benefit of the public |
| 00:08:25.96 | Dan | That is true. And I have been in contact with the city attorney regarding this manner to try to figure out if in fact, kind of what our next steps may be or may not be. |
| 00:08:38.60 | Kristina Feller | Okay. Could you maybe continue that dialogue and report back out at our next commission hearing or if there's anything pressing, if you could issue a one-way communication, but you know, before then, if it's pressing. |
| 00:08:53.10 | Dan | Okay. |
| 00:08:54.33 | Kristina Feller | Thank you. Thank you. Thank you, Kenneth. |
| 00:08:57.82 | Kenneth Henry | I'll do that. |
| 00:08:58.97 | Kristina Feller | Thank you. |
| 00:08:59.12 | Kenneth Henry | Thank you, Commissioners. |
| 00:09:00.54 | Kristina Feller | Thank you. Dan, any other items from the community development department to report out on? |
| 00:09:06.21 | Dan | There is one thing that I'm not sure if you're aware of the Sausalito general plan that was adopted in February of 2021. received the 2022 APA Northern California Award for Marriage, for comprehensive plan for small jurisdictions. So congratulations, the city of Sausalito won an award for their year-old general plan. |
| 00:09:29.11 | Kristina Feller | Thank you. That's great news. That's wonderful news. again. Anything else, anything from our city attorney, attorney, Sergio Rudin, anything from the attorney's office, Sergio? |
| 00:09:44.77 | Sergio Rudin | not that I'm aware of. |
| 00:09:46.59 | Kristina Feller | Okay, great, thank you. Let's move into Commissioner's Communications. Then we have a couple items to report out on. Let's see, why don't we start with objective design standards. Vice Chair Junius, do you wanna walk us through any updates there? |
| 00:09:55.82 | Unknown | Thank you. |
| 00:09:55.85 | Andrew Junius | Thank you. |
| 00:09:56.00 | Quinton | Thank you. |
| 00:10:02.60 | Andrew Junius | Thank you Chair Feller. I've checked in with our fantastic consultant Bob Brown he's diligently working behind the scenes with the key consultant, Opticos, Um, as I think I mentioned in previous meetings and you're very familiar with Thank you. Thank you. |
| 00:10:22.92 | Andrew Junius | taking some time. go through the details. Yeah. Thank you. Thank you. you That's taking |
| 00:10:51.62 | Andrew Junius | open session to walk the entire commission and the public through it and get feedback. We are moving, but it's still taking some time. |
| 00:10:59.71 | Kristina Feller | Outstanding and thank you for pushing this forward. It is a huge task and I'm glad you're on this working group and committee. It's a heavy lift. I also, I believe that... Bob also presented or gave an update to the Historic Preservation Commission as well and so we continue to keep them up to date. This is, I believe, the second time that we've given them an update or Bob has done so on our behalf. And I don't believe there's anything substantive that came out of that. It was just really an informational session. |
| 00:11:38.40 | Unknown | That's right. |
| 00:11:40.14 | Kristina Feller | Okay, great. Let's go ahead and move on to anything else to report out on Vice Chair Junius. |
| 00:11:48.66 | Andrew Junius | When we get down to that new legislative working group, I can speak to that or I can speak to that now. |
| 00:11:54.84 | Kristina Feller | Sure, if you'd like to go ahead and report out, sure. |
| 00:11:57.52 | Andrew Junius | Sure. I think in the last meeting, Chair Feller, and spoke to the need to kind of keep an ongoing working group focused on California legislative changes, all these housing laws that we're having to deal with. so that the working group that Commissioner Luxenberg and I were on has kind of morphed into Amen. |
| 00:12:28.98 | Andrew Junius | I don't think Commissioner Luxembourg if you don't have anything I think we're This is just the beginning of this. I'll be working closely with commissioner Luxembourg. And again, as part of what I do for a living, this is stuff I see all the time. So it will be. we should be getting, you'll be getting, I assure you'll be getting regular updates not an extraordinary detail, but you know, the flurry of stuff that's constantly happening in Sacramento will be, kept apprised of. Looking forward to that. |
| 00:12:55.93 | Kristina Feller | Great, I wanna thank you both for taking this task on. There is quite a lot of legislation and constant changes Again, I just think we're also very lucky to have Sergio as our city attorney here. for the planning commission who has a very, very good finger on the pulse of these issues too. So thank you, Sergio. Thanks to all three of you for that. Um, Dan, you had your hand raised. Um, was that regarding a legislative matters? |
| 00:13:23.80 | Dan | No, I just, after we're done, we forgot about planning. |
| 00:13:27.50 | Kristina Feller | Oh, okay. |
| 00:13:28.93 | Dan | If we could go back to him, I just wanted to mention that. |
| 00:13:32.16 | Kristina Feller | Okay, we will go back to him. We will not forget Quinton. I didn't see him here on the screen. |
| 00:13:33.29 | Dan | Thank you. |
| 00:13:39.29 | Kristina Feller | Let's move on to Commissioner Saad and reporting out on the housing element advisory committee please. |
| 00:13:46.23 | Nastassya Saad | Sure, thank you, Chair Feiler. So our last housing element meeting was on May 23rd and our output was to finalize the opportunity sites. And we went through neighborhood by neighborhood, any site that needed more direction input, also discussing some preferences for mixed use or multifamily development. and that was achieved at that meeting. Those sites are going to be included in the draft housing element. And over the course of the next two meetings, we're going to be reviewing the draft housing element. And that is where we will weave in our discussion for fair housing. So our agenda has changed slightly from a few meetings back. So I would encourage anyone to check out the virtual binder or go to the housing element advisory committee page on the city website. So you can see an updated schedule as well. The next meeting is going to be on the 27th of this month. And that's again, when we're going to start going over that draft housing element. And after all of our comments are taken into consideration, we will have a draft for public review, 30 day public review. So coming up pretty quickly, there are comments that continue to come in for the housing element and for opportunity sites as well. So any comments, any feedback that the community wants to continue to send, still reach us all at the HIAC at Saucelito.gov. And they're just being collated, so it's great to get public comment ahead of time. And did I miss anything Chair Feller? |
| 00:15:35.43 | Kristina Feller | The only thing I would add to that, and that's a great report out, is that these opportunity sites and our housing list is critical to start the EIR process, which is the Environmental Impact Report process. I would encourage everybody to keep an eye out for that. That will be a parallel track to finalizing some of these sites. We are intentionally looking for a larger catchment area of sites to actually enter into the EIR process because we know that through the EIR, some of those might be discarded. on the merits of environmental issues so i continue to be very impressed with the community involvement and everybody's sending their comments in i encourage you to please continue to do that it's so critical Your voice is making a difference in the process. As you hear in some of our discussions, we are eliminating or adding certain properties based on a lot of the community input. So it's very much appreciated and it's very much taken to heart. So thank you everybody for that. And thank you, Commissioner Saad, for your involvement with the HEAC. Anything else to report out, Commissioner Sanchez? |
| 00:16:54.86 | Nastassya Saad | Nothing else from my side. Thank you, Chair Peller. |
| 00:16:57.48 | Kristina Feller | Okay, great. In that case, Commissioner Luxenberg, let's move to Parklet's real quick. |
| 00:17:04.92 | Jeffery Luxenberg | Sure. Thank you Chair Fowler. The Parkland Working Group made a presentation to the City Council on May 24th. It was well received by the City Council. We focused and made it clear, because there was some question, that it would be a ministerial process that was being recommended. The City Council did ask that a checklist be added to the proposed Parkland application. |
| 00:17:05.80 | Kristina Feller | Thank you. |
| 00:17:29.47 | Jeffery Luxenberg | They also asked the working group to meet with the Chamber of Commerce, and that's in process being set up. And they also asked that the staff look at each of the parklets that or established under the COVID emergency program to determine any modifications that might have to be made to those. And then they also asked that for outdoor dining, that some sort of outline be established so that, when tables and chairs are moved around, that they stay and keep the sidewalks, basically that five foot minimum distance and sidewalks clear. So that process will be developed as part of this. So there's a little bit of follow up, but it all went pretty well, I think. Any other additions that you want to add? Sure, fellow. |
| 00:18:16.52 | Kristina Feller | I think it was interesting discussion at the city council. I think. the willingness for the Chamber of Commerce to assist with a public outreach event. is very helpful. We're trying to work out what that date might be. And again, the working group is doing that on behalf of the city council. And we, hopefully staff can assist with identifying the best time and date for that. And we expect that to be this month in June. So for anybody listening in at home, we're hoping to get that information out to the public so your participation can be included. in that outreach process as soon as we can lock down that date. So thank you very much, Commissioner Luxenberg. And also thank you to Commissioner Graff for the incredible benchmarking process that went in before this report was put together, it definitely shaped, you know, how we looked at parklets for Sausalito and how it's appropriate to Sausalito. So thank you. Anything else Commissioner Luxenberg to report out on? |
| 00:19:30.75 | Jeffery Luxenberg | Uh, that would be, uh, uh, uh, Commissioner Junior has talked about the legislative part of it. So I'm all set. |
| 00:19:38.24 | Kristina Feller | Okay. |
| 00:19:38.56 | Jeffery Luxenberg | Thank you, Chair. |
| 00:19:39.04 | Richard Graef | Thank you. |
| 00:19:39.22 | Jeffery Luxenberg | you |
| 00:19:39.90 | Kristina Feller | And commissioner graph, anything to report out on at this time? |
| 00:19:43.98 | Richard Graef | nothing to report. Thank you. |
| 00:19:46.34 | Kristina Feller | Bye. I just wanted to report out one other thing and I'll get to you, Vice Chair Junius, in just one moment. But we will be hosting Southerman Fire District here at our public hearing in two weeks on June 15th. We've asked them to come to certainly start a dialogue with the planning commission, but also to present to you, the public, about their new evacuation routes, any updates on their preferred planting programs and preferred species. And just we're coming into fire season, although I sometimes don't know that we're ever out of it, but certainly with the drought and the water restrictions that we're facing here in California and Northern California and Sausalito, it's best to always be prepared and keep that dialogue moving. So we will ensure that something is in the Sausalito currents for everybody, but mark your calendars. In two weeks, we will have Southern Wind Fire here. to present to us and provide an opportunity for you to ask questions of them. So other than that Vice Chair Junius you had your hand raised. |
| 00:20:59.04 | Andrew Junius | Thank you, Chuck. I forgot to just update everybody in a reminder. The SB 9 ordinance is moving toward its final stages. It's gonna be presented to the city council at their meeting on June 14th, if I'm not mistaken. So I think that's still on. And Commissioner Lipsenberg and I will be there to represent the commission and answer any questions at the city council to answer any questions on behalf of the commission. That's it. Thank you. |
| 00:21:23.22 | Dan | Carry for me. And as well as I'm getting the packet for that prepared and will be with city city attorneys so they can review it before it's due. and before the meeting. |
| 00:21:38.93 | Kristina Feller | Excellent, excellent. |
| 00:21:39.05 | Dan | Yes. |
| 00:21:41.31 | Kristina Feller | Um, with that, Dan, let's go ahead and ask Quinton if he could report out on enforcement matters here in the city. |
| 00:21:49.11 | Jeffery Luxenberg | Chair Powell, before that, Dan, could you forward that packet to Andrew and I? you When you send that to city council, please. Thank you. |
| 00:21:57.12 | Dan | to be able to get a |
| 00:21:57.29 | Jeffery Luxenberg | you |
| 00:21:58.14 | Kristina Feller | Yep. Thank you, Commissioner Luxenberg. Yes. Thank you. Okay. Good evening, Quentin. |
| 00:22:04.72 | Quinton | Good evening, Chair, Fire, and Commissioners. Thank you for the invitation to speak. I will attempt to make this brief. I want to focus on the tree case that you guys, that you highlighted in the previous meeting, that you wanted me to update you on. Pretty significant tree alteration case at the address of 75 Black Avenue. And I performed several site visits and an investigation, including speaking with finding the parties, It turns out there are several neighbors that were working together to achieve the result of more than 40 trees being severely altered. And essentially they were topped, the top half, the canopies of these trees were all removed. |
| 00:23:00.15 | Unknown | you know, |
| 00:23:10.55 | Quinton | And, um, Thank you. Last week we had an arborist doing And, um, determine the extent of the work and the conditions of the trees and trying to identify where the other trees were located and the sizes of the trees. Thank you. And after measure the diameter to determine how it affects, how the code affects the tree. So, and also to determine whether these trees are, we need to know when we're applying the code to this case, to to determine the violation we do not only the size or the diameter of the trees at breast height but also what species tree and how many of each species and that the species will tell us if it's a protected tree or not And okay, so the result from the arborist, and I encourage you to read the arborist report is only three pages and also, that focuses on the trees in the public right away. that were from the beginning of the public library. And then also read the one page letter for all of this regarding the trees to be altered in a private property. So to summarize his, my results and also the, the, um, of these results. The August Fundamentals was hired by the City Public Works Department. And because of the nature of the case, it was determined that the city needed to do that. So, Thank you. Thank you. The arborist found 26 trees located in the public right of way. you And then we both guessed that another 20 odd trees that were practically a private property The vast majority of the trees are black occasion, which is considered an undesirable tree And also the vast majority of these trees have a diameter, a breast height diameter of less than 10 inches. So, and I'm sure you're gonna have a lot of questions about this, there are a lot of questions and it's a great learning opportunity in this case because it involves the public property and the private property, the sizes of the trees, undesirable trees. Um, And also, and the the motive. behind why the neighbors cut the trees. So the history And then I'll try to wrap it up here I think I covered, so as far as code violation, if I wanna know that first, and then I'll tell you a little bit the history behind why they cut the trees. AND I THINK THAT'S A So these trees are undesirable trees. The code violation is not that they cut them, top thing, basically cut off the top half. it's that so many of these trees were in the public right away and that requires, if anybody wants to do anything in the public right away, You really need to contact the Public Works Department. and get a permit to do that. And that also applies to these trees. So they cut 26 trees in the public library, whether they are undesirable or not, they needed a permit from the public library to do that. So that's the potential code violations. Um, And, um, as far as the history, behind, let me talk about the private property as well. Since these are undesirable trees on the fire department that would cut those That's not a violation of COVID. um, So there's some other questions that you have raised. When you look at our code, there are other impacts that even undesirable trees can provide benefits to the neighborhood, to the private property, residents or owners, such as windscreen, shade, neighborhood character. So there's a lot of Sometimes the trees can block the headlights of passing cars. So there's a lot of reason why you might find benefit even with undesirable trees. And that's something that, we could discuss at a later date. But so the end result is they cut the trees down after interviewing property owners and residents. There's three properties, 72 Platt, . which is uphill. from the top of the trees we've cut and 66 flat. Both of those homes are uphill. And so those two homeowners along with the, the, the owner and resident of 75 flat were all in agreement to cut these trees on a regular basis. And it turns out these trees, after going back with old Google images and such, um, and interviewing the property owners, these trees have been cut routinely over several decades. And I have recommended evidence that they were at least cut once in the last seven years or so. The same way, just completely the top half the trees were removed and probably about 40 odd trees were topped. So that said, so that's the, it's a somewhat complicated situation. It's not like normally just have one person goes out, one responsible party goes out and cuts down a couple of trees, a couple of big trees. In this case, it's 40 trees that have been routinely cut in at the halfway point. And the trees are quite rugged, even with that severe alteration. they throw back. and they read well their full canopy. and you can't tell anything ever happened to them. And then that can happen in just, of, a very short time. maybe a year or so and then walk. You can go back to Covey House again. So. There you have it. Um, I imagine you probably have any good questions with I hope the chair decided what to do next. I hope that gives you an idea what's going on. |
| 00:29:54.08 | Kristina Feller | Quinton, thank you so much for reporting out and for putting this sort of at the top of your list. This has been going on almost a year. This was first brought to the commission's attention in August of last year. And so it's nice to finally get a report out on this. I know there have been some other people working on this. Because this is under communications, we really can't get into a full dialogue at the moment. But I think that part of the reason the commission has continued to ask about this is that it's so flagrant. and egregious. And what it does is it knocks out a whole habitat and that's why it keeps coming in front of us. So Dan, I would ask that perhaps this type of an item take on a different, a place on our agenda under a business item or something else where we actually can enter into a dialogue. properly. And I guess Quinton, if you have any other items regarding enforcement or that list that we've asked for, it would be great if we could use the time and communications just to report out on whatever you know quickly what the status is and if there are any items on your enforcement that require a little bit more dialogue with the commission, then we can certainly put it under a different, a different area on the agenda. but certainly appreciate all your hard work in looking into this and getting the information flowing. |
| 00:31:25.27 | Quinton | and Thank you. Thank you, Will. I think I'll just give you a very brief report on my other activity. This is for example, I'm just building a way to report a lot of information in this small space and I'm getting there. So, but I'll give you April and Mays will come soon after and I'm starting to get it down so it'll come quicker. next time but in April for instance first just a reminder or if something you should know is that I work three days a week I could certainly have over 100 cases I could certainly work five days a week easily and still have you know still not covered everything I need to cover in that time but I do work three a week. So I try to focus on the most important cases, which is anything that's a health or safety, major health or safety hazard. But at the same time, I do, if there's some low hanging fruit cases that I can close quickly, I will also, that maybe aren't as important, I'll also take care of those. So, Yes, roughly over 100 cases in April, I opened 15 cases, closed 23 cases, and I did about 21 inspections, probably more. I'm working on the detailed activities like phone calls and inspections and meetings and such. Trying to get that so I can just have that all in our tracking system. I can just push it back and it all comes out. A nice list. And let's see what else, something I didn't talk about before is short term rentals, which represents a major part of my cases. And in the month of April, we had about 20, 22 letters go out notices to owners that we found evidence that they were, that they had an advertisement for short term rentals somewhere on the internet. And the good news is about 13 of those owners Um... responded and took down their ads. And so they're complying now. um, Several others were disputing whether they were actually advertising for less than 30 days. and then about four more, no response. They're still advertising. So yeah, I can do it. Anyway, that's good news. And that's typical of every month we send it out. We send out about that many letters and get that type of response. |
| 00:34:11.98 | Kristina Feller | Right. Thank you. Thank you, Quinton, very much. Um, I think if there are no other items to report out by staff or Quinton or Dan, We're going to go ahead and take public comment right now. on communications. So if you are a member of the public and you'd like to comment, on anything you've heard under communications, now's the time to do so. If you could raise your hand. in the Zoom application or press star nine from a cell phone. I'm just going to go ahead and look for hands right now. |
| 00:34:47.57 | Kristina Feller | I'm not seeing any hands in the audience. So I'm going to go ahead and close public comment. And I'm gonna move ahead to the next item on our agenda, which is the approval. of the planning commission meeting minutes which is item number five Do I have any comments from any commissioners just for this show of hands? Commissioner Luxenberg. |
| 00:35:08.71 | Jeffery Luxenberg | Thank you Chair Feuillard. On page three, line 38, It should say 253 Glen instead of 233 Glen if we could just make that. a typo correction. And then I noted that in the meeting notes, the indicated we've been meeting notes of the previous two meetings were approved as amended and I want to just look at those on the website and there are no meetings at all for 2022 and there's only very few for 2021 so Dan can you Have those been posted? Are they just not? Do I just not have the right links, the ones that you, that were signed and approved? |
| 00:35:52.34 | Dan | Bye. |
| 00:35:52.54 | Jeffery Luxenberg | Thank you. |
| 00:35:52.74 | Dan | They have not been signed yet. That's something that staff is working on. We are trying to go through to make sure that we have all the ones prepared for Chair Feller to sign. I know she brought this up a few meetings back. And we have found that There hasn't been consistency in the department. So we're looking at past agendas. and making sure that they were approved Um, those agendas so that we can bring them all forward uh but the two the two uh as amended they were amended and resent and i checked for the changes that you had requested and they were on there |
| 00:36:32.35 | Jeffery Luxenberg | Okay, but if you can, once those get signed, are you saying that All of the ones for all of 2022 have yet to be signed because they're not posted. |
| 00:36:45.17 | Kristina Feller | Nothing's been signed by me. |
| 00:36:46.99 | Jeffery Luxenberg | Yeah. for all of 2022. I see. |
| 00:36:51.68 | Kristina Feller | All of 2022. Nothing's been sent to me to sign. Okay. |
| 00:36:55.31 | Jeffery Luxenberg | Okay, so Dan, if we could get those sent and once you get the signature, if you could then post them on the website so we can then have them as a reference IVL. That's our goal. Okay, thank you. That's all I have on the, on, on these particular minutes, Chair Felder. |
| 00:37:09.72 | Kristina Feller | Thank you. |
| 00:37:10.57 | Quinton | Thank you. |
| 00:37:14.43 | Kristina Feller | Great, thank you very much. Dan, I had sent you some other comments. Vice Chair Junius is our Vice Chair, not Vice Chair Graff. |
| 00:37:23.43 | Dan | Yeah. I missed that, but yeah, I got that. |
| 00:37:25.96 | Kristina Feller | Bye. Oh my God. Thank you. |
| 00:37:26.53 | Dan | Thank you. |
| 00:37:27.61 | Kristina Feller | Okay. um any other comments from any other commissioner if not i will take a motion oh yes vice chair jenny |
| 00:37:34.57 | Andrew Junius | I just want to thank Commissioner Luxenberg for staying on top of the amendments For us, Commissioner, thank you so much. It's very much appreciated. love. |
| 00:37:44.77 | Kristina Feller | They're here. Thank you. Okay, so with those changes that Commissioner Luxenberg has mentioned, as well as I have, is there a motion to approve and a second? |
| 00:37:57.73 | Quinton | So, |
| 00:37:59.89 | Kristina Feller | Thank you. |
| 00:38:00.87 | Quinton | Okay. |
| 00:38:00.91 | Kristina Feller | Thank you. |
| 00:38:00.97 | Quinton | Thank you. |
| 00:38:00.99 | Kristina Feller | Thank you. Dan, could you take roll call? |
| 00:38:05.38 | Dan | Commissioner Graff. Yeah. Commissioner Luxenberg. |
| 00:38:09.06 | Jeffery Luxenberg | God bless. |
| 00:38:09.78 | Dan | Commissioner Saad? Yeah. Vice-Chair Junius. Yes. Chair Feller? |
| 00:38:15.47 | Kristina Feller | Thank you. |
| 00:38:15.49 | Dan | you can see. |
| 00:38:15.55 | Kristina Feller | Yeah. |
| 00:38:15.67 | Dan | Yes. THE END OF Motion carries unanimously. |
| 00:38:19.77 | Kristina Feller | Right, thank you. Let's move on to item number six and into 6A, which is 2015 Bridgeway. Dan, I'll hand that over to you. |
| 00:38:28.95 | Dan | All right, this is the time for any commissioners to declare any ex parte communications. |
| 00:38:35.79 | Kristina Feller | Okay, Commissioner Saad. |
| 00:38:38.17 | Dan | Thank you. |
| 00:38:38.18 | Richard Graef | I think today. |
| 00:38:38.71 | Nastassya Saad | Thank you. |
| 00:38:38.86 | Richard Graef | Thank you. |
| 00:38:39.79 | Kristina Feller | Commissioner Graff? |
| 00:38:41.54 | Richard Graef | THE END OF |
| 00:38:43.03 | Kristina Feller | Mr. Luxenberg. |
| 00:38:44.34 | Richard Graef | and then two, |
| 00:38:44.97 | Jeffery Luxenberg | Clara. |
| 00:38:45.95 | Kristina Feller | Vice Chair Junius. |
| 00:38:47.38 | Jeffery Luxenberg | Thank you. |
| 00:38:48.17 | Dan | Thank you. |
| 00:38:48.78 | Kristina Feller | I have none to declare either. |
| 00:38:51.60 | Dan | All right. So the 6A, the first public hearing is for 215 Bridgeway. It's a conditional use permit and a density bonus project. but, The project number is 2021-00110. Magda Gonzalez is the contract planner, but I will speak ahead of this. Staff has been in contact with the applicants Um. as well as received more information from the applicant today that this was originally submitted as an SB330. HAA project which was unbeknownst to staff until today. after we were talking to their legal to the applicant's attorney. Um, Not only that, but we found some discrepancies between their plan set and what we had originally put in the staff report. And another document that surfaced yesterday about their density bonus and that their plan set showed three affordable units. However, they're only asking for two affordable units The 25% to get the 50% bonus. to reach the 12 unit total. So. Yeah. In lieu of all that, I discussed the project with the attorney this morning, and they've opted to continue to a date certain, which would be June 15th. |
| 00:40:17.86 | Kristina Feller | Okay, thank you for that update. Sergio, just a quick question to you because I know that since this is already publicly noticed we have to take public comment is a staff presentation required can we move directly into public comment. |
| 00:40:34.49 | Sergio Rudin | No, I don't think a staff presentation is required, but yes, you do need to take public comment. |
| 00:40:39.60 | Kristina Feller | Okay. Thank you for the clarification. Okay, yes, Commissioner Luxenberg. |
| 00:40:45.25 | Jeffery Luxenberg | If we're not going to get a staff report, I have questions that I want to get on the record so that when they go back and work this out so that we don't have errors and other stuff in the staff report, this would seem to be the time. Do we do that before or after public comment? |
| 00:41:01.13 | Kristina Feller | You're welcome to do that now. |
| 00:41:03.05 | Jeffery Luxenberg | Okay. uh so uh in the in regards to the staff report there was a mention of uh land use policy in the general plan i think it was 2.13 regarding neighborhood commercial uses and the staff report seems to imply that somehow this housing on the first floor of of this project which is not allowed by the zoning code is a is under land use. Whereas that land use policy is intended for, to provide, cause we have very few commercial neighborhood zones. The purpose of that section of the general plan was to ensure that we have enough retail commercial spaces. And so I understand that this project is being done for other purposes, but I think that that land use policy should be deleted from the staff report because it's just a wrong interpretation of that. And to that effort, there appears to be a number of concessions that this project is looking for, not the least of which is trying to eliminate commercial space on the first floor, which is only doesn't allow. And I think that's an issue. And then there was some discussion And this is where the confusion is of putting affordable units on the first floor they're all going to be on the first floor. Those spaces, which are supposed to be commercial, have virtually no windows. They're not a good place for apartments. And I think it's not in the city's best interest that the affordable units would be on the first floor at all. And if they are commercial spaces, one of the benefits of going down that road and keeping the zoning as it is, is at least the affordable units would have to be above the first floor. So that I think is something else that should be discussed with the project proponents. There are also side yard setbacks, rear yard setbacks. There's a whole bunch of concessions being looked for on the project, which I think are a little bit troubling. I realized that this is, they're allowed to get the density with the affordable units and they're allowed to get 12 units, but I want to flag that if they change two of the apartments on the upper level from two bedrooms to either one bedroom to a studio, they can still get 12 units above the first floor. So they don't need in order to maintain the density which they're allowed to do under uh under the section of the code that they're using for the state uh they can they can get that number of units but they don't have to take away the commercial spaces to do it or put affordable houses into the worst units so i want the those to be on the record for when that gets reviewed. There was also some concern I saw that the interim primary director sent out a revised uh things from marine fire i want to make sure that marine fire has been contacted has specifically contacted on the project which they appear to have done in the revised thing that was sent out but there is some discussion that the elevator needs to be able to be goingney accessible. I'm not sure the elevator that's shown on the plans is gurney accessible. Anyways, so those are just some of the issues. I flagged those because this was something where we keep advertising projects that don't seem to be ready. So I think that it's important that these issues be addressed and others that obviously will come out of any discussions and uh we need to get those those thorough analysis in the report for for the next meeting if it would be june 14th which seems a little bit quick but if it is able to get there so anyways at this point uh i called uh comments in case there are any public comments uh to reserve the right to give any additional comments after that but thank you chair |
| 00:45:10.51 | Kristina Feller | Thank you, Commissioner Luxenberg. um vice chair junius |
| 00:45:14.58 | Andrew Junius | chair feller um i appreciate the comments commissioner luxembourg very excellent And I'd also like to just remind |
| 00:45:24.82 | Andrew Junius | are pretty complicated even a small one like this Um, in addition to concessions, that the property owner developer is entitled to. There are also waivers. they're entitled to as well. that distinction, although |
| 00:45:53.98 | Andrew Junius | Bye. list to Commissioner Luxenberg's comments so thank you. |
| 00:45:58.15 | Kristina Feller | Thank you very much, Vice Chair Junius. Commissioner Saad. |
| 00:46:02.33 | Nastassya Saad | In the spirit of asking questions ahead of time for the staff report, there was a note on page, on page three to discuss the ingress and egress of the parking. And I was just wondering for the next round, if there was any comment from the Department of Public Works potentially or any other a necessary department at the city for a safety concern because that's a heavily used area of Bridgeway. And currently it's been vacant for a very long time. So, there isn't a lot of traffic flow in and out. And of course with that many units and what they're proposing for parking, My concern is that bike specific. There are a lot of cyclists going very quickly down that area. So just to see if there's any comment for any issues around, um, safety concern from any flow of traffic coming in and out of that space. And that would be all I have for right now. Thank you, Chair Feller. |
| 00:47:08.35 | Kristina Feller | Thank you very much. Commissioner Graf. |
| 00:47:12.68 | Richard Graef | um Well, I, I'm looking forward to... I'm a good definition of the density bonus it's confusing and And I think that when we hear this, it would be really good to get a complete explanation of that. Um, There are a lot of, you know, kind of small detail questions I have about the, which I don't want to get into now. um, Although there was one thing I noticed a sign out in front and I was I don't know if there's, an application for a sign permit or whether that's part of the project. So I No result. was there but but no mention of it in the staff report Yeah, so that's just a question I had. Yeah, I think a lot of these, I think, you know, I would like to say until they, yeah, you know, the hearing. |
| 00:48:22.13 | Kristina Feller | Great. Thank you very much. Dan, just a couple comments from me. I certainly see eye to eye with Commissioner Luxembourg's comments and having been a member of that general plan working group, uh that got this general plan approved um i'm very curious about um the issue regarding the commercial and convenience retail at the base uh as well as the idea of affordable housing uh at that ground level in in a what i would consider to be a compromised layout from any other |
| 00:48:47.03 | Nastassya Saad | Uh, |
| 00:48:59.40 | Kristina Feller | apartment in that same building. Also know that this is a, what I guess is a conversion back to a residential building. It was residential, then office, now back to residential. But just because it was maybe originally built or intended to be residential, the proposed use or the number of units is quite different than what the original, plan was and I my understanding is that they're not necessarily expanding the footprint of the building. So I'm assuming that those setbacks will be explained as sort of legal non-conforming or something along those lines. but I think it's really important that, you know, particularly when we get these kinds of applications, which are very important, you know, here in Sausalito, that we're also getting a complete application because I'm not sure that what we have is even deemed a complete application. So I would really ask staff to focus on complete applications because what I see is not complete. And I'm definitely happy to continue this to a date certain, but that date certain better be certain that it's a complete application before we hear it. is what my comment would be. So with that, I think that my fellow commissioners, their comments are excellent. And I really appreciate Vice Chair Junius weighing in on waiver versus concession. And I definitely am curious to learn more about that when this is a complete application. So if there are no other comments from commissioners at this time, just by a show of hands, I'm going to go ahead and open this up to public comment. This is item 6A on our agenda. If you would like to make public comment, you can raise your hand in the Zoom application or press star nine on your cell phone. I see one hand here. a 50 Jenny Rinders, good evening and welcome. You'll have three minutes for public comment. If you don't mind unmuting yourself, sharing your camera, the floor is yours. |
| 00:51:08.02 | Jenny Rinders | Thank you. Okay, thank you so much. So my name is Jenny. I'm the apparel neighbor of the proposed department. It is true, it used to be apartments when I was a child some 55 years ago. We had a lot less cars in town back then. They even had a swimming pool that shows you they didn't get the parking places. So I really appreciate all of your comments and your concern for our neighborhood. I'm grateful that you're really taking this seriously because it's... I mean for me Olive Street's a narrow street it's a dead end we have limited parking traditionally The people who work at the office buildings have parked on Olive Street because you cannot head north out of their parking lot. um, . Olive Street is a hard street to get onto from Ridgway because traffic is 35 miles an hour which really means 40 something in all fairness. People ride my bumper when I'm trying to turn. It's a blind turn. because it's a sharp, It's a hill, there's vegetation, land, and you can't see. So it's hard to get onto Olive Street. It's hard to get off of Olive Street because you have basically three lanes to navigate. um, And bicycles. Don't forget the bicycles. I'm assuming Dude. Because you know, the, the apartments asked saying that they're going to reduce from 21 to 18 parking places, but one of those is handicapped. So if nobody in the units qualifies, that's really basically 17 spots only. I'm assuming what's gonna happen is that the overflow parking is when all of the streets fall, which often is, is gonna go to the far side of Bridgeway. We have no crosswalk. for Olive Street. The crosswalk to get across Bridgeway at spring is dangerous. It's super short. And the people coming down spring have a green light and they turn onto you. They turn left and You're at their mercy. So my question for everyone is what can we do to make, our intersection getting in and out of Olive Street, safer. for both vehicle use. And also getting across the street if we have to get to Park Tires on the far side of Bridgeway. I know it sounds like I'm asking for a unicorn, but I would love a stoplight. |
| 00:53:47.44 | Jenny Rinders | And if I can't have a stoplight, I would love crosswalk and those great big lines that say, you know, keep clear. to at least, alert people that there's a street here. And, um, Anyway, thank you for your time. I really appreciate the care that you guys are putting into this. Thank you so much. |
| 00:54:08.45 | Kristina Feller | Thank you very much, Jenny. I'm looking for any other hands from the public for public comment this evening on item 6A, which is 2015 Bridgeway. You can raise your hand in the Zoom application or press star nine. I am not seeing the any more hands in the public. So I'll go ahead and close public comment. Dan, just a quick question to you. Did we receive any written comment? I did not see any. if you could just confirm if something did in the eye. |
| 00:54:41.80 | Dan | Thank you. |
| 00:54:42.25 | Kristina Feller | Amen. |
| 00:54:42.66 | Dan | Yes, Chair, members of the commission. We received one from Lorette Rogers. and I included that on the agenda. in Raneckens. So it was included in the agenda. |
| 00:54:56.55 | Kristina Feller | Okay. Thank you very much. |
| 00:54:58.45 | Dan | right? |
| 00:54:59.84 | Kristina Feller | Thank you very much. So that goes, so we've closed public comment here. Any final comments? Items for comment, Vice Chair Junius, you wanna start us off? |
| 00:55:09.27 | Andrew Junius | I'm curious, it doesn't look like good at all for share. Correct, Dan? Is there, I don't see any. |
| 00:55:13.67 | Dan | Thank you. |
| 00:55:13.69 | Andrew Junius | I didn't see. |
| 00:55:13.72 | Dan | I don't see their name, no. |
| 00:55:16.53 | Andrew Junius | So to, you know, to Commissioner Luxenberg's point, |
| 00:55:33.23 | Andrew Junius | and Dave H. ASK FOR A GENE 15 15. They're going to I'm going to go. |
| 00:55:39.97 | Dan | Ready? Um... Thank you. You know, I talked to the attorney this morning, they would feel more comfortable if it went to on the 15th but on the 6th of July is the next meeting after that Um. We have Valhalla and 52 Varda Landings. So, |
| 00:56:14.95 | Andrew Junius | We've got to be ready in a week to get the staff report you'd have time to do this after, right? |
| 00:56:18.68 | Dan | Okay. I told him that and |
| 00:56:22.93 | Andrew Junius | Well, we can give them a ton lashing if they show up in an upper bar, so I guess. |
| 00:56:27.65 | Dan | Thank you. I think it would be up to the commission to decide what they If you feel you need more time or it needs more time, then I would leave that up to the commission. |
| 00:56:39.79 | Kristina Feller | Well, let me try to tease this out a little further because I think Vice Chair Junius has asked the right question. because I'm also going to, put a little bit back on you, Dan, that kind of help us here. I don't think we have a complete application. So CDD needs a complete application before it can actually come to the Planning Commission. Do you have a complete application? Because from where I'm sitting and what I'm looking at, you don't. |
| 00:57:10.33 | Dan | So they submitted their preliminary application for SB 330. in April of last year. At that point afterwards, they submitted a complete application and they were deemed complete. I don't know the exact date. but they were deemed complete by I think it was Christy Escher. There's a letter that they sent I'd have to look. I don't have it off the top of my head, but they were deemed complete. As far as I see, until we knew today that they had submitted for the SB 330, that's what changed the whole kind of dynamic of the project for staff. That's why staff was so amiable to go ahead and push it forward because we wanted to make sure that we were able to give the commission that as well. |
| 00:58:02.42 | Kristina Feller | Bye. |
| 00:58:02.57 | Dan | Thank you. |
| 00:58:02.68 | Kristina Feller | Bye. Yeah, I appreciate the feedback. I mean, if we do not have a. a time implication here. Again, we would prefer that we have a complete report an application before we hear it. We don't certainly want to waste anybody's time. Um, and you're closer to this than we are at this point, do you feel that you can get both a complete application And. prepare a complete staff report before the date certain that this applicant is looking for of June 15th. because as Vice Chair Junius properly said, I mean, if we don't, You know, it's just a colossal waste of everyone's time. |
| 00:58:55.93 | Dan | Yeah, I mean, I would also, |
| 00:58:56.19 | Kristina Feller | I mean, I would also, |
| 00:58:58.70 | Dan | for, I'm sorry. Commissioner Graham, and I? Oh, I'm sorry. Go ahead, Dan. From a staff perspective, I'd be curious to what you feel is not how it makes it incomplete. Because that would help us. |
| 00:59:15.85 | Kristina Feller | Sure. |
| 00:59:16.10 | Dan | THE END OF THE END OF THE |
| 00:59:16.64 | Kristina Feller | Well, I think both Commissioner Graff and Commissioner Luxenberg have their hand up to maybe weigh in on this. But I do believe just to tee that off Commissioner Luxembourg was correct in terms of the interpretation of the zoning and what's before us, which doesn't really meet the general plan requirement. But Commissioner Graff, you had your hand up first. I'm gonna hand it to you and then to Commissioner Luxenberg. |
| 00:59:44.45 | Richard Graef | Thanks, Chair Freller. Well, in terms of completeness, I felt that the package was pretty incomplete. And I think I mentioned the sign out in front. There was nothing, no detail on the sign and doesn't seem to be part of the application, which it should be. it seems to me. And then the structure, the parking, the new covered parking structure there's virtually no detail on that there's a very schematic cross-action in one of the drawings but it doesn't talk about materials or any kind of detail. So I feel like the whole submittal, you know, is really missing some, some major parts so I just want to be sure that those bases all get covered. Go. |
| 01:00:40.36 | Dan | Thank you. |
| 01:00:40.39 | Richard Graef | So, |
| 01:00:40.96 | Dan | Let me interject real quick. There's a checklist for SB 330 with 17 items that they're required to submit. They submitted all those items. |
| 01:00:49.22 | Unknown | Mm-hmm. |
| 01:00:49.47 | Dan | which helped make it a complete application. But I'll let Sergio jump in too. he might have something better than that. |
| 01:00:57.32 | Sergio Rudin | Yeah, so, you know, with respect to, you know, state law provides that when you submit a preliminary application, as long as you provide the information required by state law, that preliminary application is deemed filed. regardless of whether you filled out the city's forms or what have you, as long as you provide the app, the information required to submit a preliminary application, It is defiled upon receipt. Thank you. Thereafter, I believe, Folks have, it's, I believe it's 90 days to submit a complete application. The city is actually required by state law to have on its website. all of the requirements to submit what is a complete application. And upon submission of that information, basically the city has 30 days to review. What? it has received, whether it means that you know, checklist that the city's supposed to have posted and If it fails to say that you have haven't. submitted it, you know, the information required by the city, the application is deemed complete. And thereafter the city has to act on it, regardless of whether things are missing, So, you know, I would. I would caution the commissioners in terms of expressing your opinions on the merits of this project. At this point, applicants not here to sort of present their case. but it is certainly, YOU KNOW, appropriate to provide feedback to staff on whatever additional information you might want to get from the applicant when they do come here for the hearing sort of discussing the merits of the project. |
| 01:02:32.49 | Kristina Feller | Thank you for the guidance, Sergio. I appreciate that. Commissioner Luxenberg, did you have anything to add? |
| 01:02:41.45 | Jeffery Luxenberg | Yes, I do, Chair and Fallon. Thank you. So I'm a little confused. The first time I heard of this, 3.30 was in the last day or so. If it's under 3.30, I don't think it can have what's eventual on the first floor, but I don't know that for sure because I haven't had a chance to analyze that part of it. If it's under the number 9-5-6-5 that's another thing. And whether we call it a complete application or don't call it a complete application, basically before this comes before us, at whatever meeting we now decide, we need to know whether it's 3.30 or 6.5915. We need to know how many affordable units there are. We need to know where they are. We need to know what the deed restrictions are going to be. And we need a complete staff report. And so the applicant needs to update their drawings because they're clearly wrong. And let's go on Commissioner Junius's comments. Let's be real about this. In order for you to get something to us for the June 15th meeting, you need to send it out next Thursday or Friday. So you're gonna have a complete final staff report next Thursday or Friday. They haven't even revised their drawings. They don't even know what we've said tonight. They can go back and look at the tape and they can talk to you about that. But in order for them to get that to you and then for you to write a staff report and this to get on the June 15th date seems highly unlikely. And so my suggestion is we pick not the June 15th date because it just doesn't seem realistic. but audience may have thought. |
| 01:04:26.74 | Kristina Feller | Yes. Great. Thank you, Commissioner Luxenberg. Dan, any comment on that? |
| 01:04:31.98 | Dan | Thank you. |
| 01:04:32.08 | Kristina Feller | Thank you. |
| 01:04:32.24 | Dan | I do. |
| 01:04:32.30 | Kristina Feller | Thank you. |
| 01:04:32.32 | Dan | Thank you. |
| 01:04:32.39 | Kristina Feller | Thank you. |
| 01:04:32.44 | Dan | Thanks a day. Thank you. applicant's attorney and they're logging on right now. Thank you. |
| 01:04:39.02 | Kristina Feller | Well, that's fine, but we're in deliberations now. We're not opening this up again to public comment. That's already closed. |
| 01:04:39.04 | Dan | THAT'S WHAT I'M GOING TO |
| 01:04:45.58 | Unknown | Oh, okay. |
| 01:04:45.95 | Kristina Feller | So the issue is if we continue this to, to a date certain of perhaps July 6th. or just as a date uncertain. is really the issue at hand here. I think that Dan, you've received some some pretty clear comments back from the commission here. And, um, I think that we'll have to make a motion to continue this item. and the question is uh if it's a july 6 continuation or just a date uncertain. And if you have a feeling one way or the other, Dan, about what it will take for you and your staff to receive new information and prepare the report then that would be helpful guidance to the commission so we can make a proper motion. |
| 01:05:38.76 | Dan | Yeah, I think we can coordinate with the applicant you know, the information that you need Um. that you're talking about tonight. Um, |
| 01:05:52.58 | Dan | Yeah. Bye. I think. I mean, They were intent on doing a date certain. |
| 01:06:00.97 | Kristina Feller | We can do a date certain. We're not arguing with a date certain, but I think the date certain is more likely a July 6th date. |
| 01:06:03.16 | Dan | Okay. |
| 01:06:07.65 | Kristina Feller | Okay. than anything else. based on what has to happen here. |
| 01:06:14.01 | Dan | That'll work. |
| 01:06:15.05 | Kristina Feller | Okay. So in that case, I'd like to make a motion to continue this item to a date certain of July 6th. |
| 01:06:25.11 | Dan | SECOND. |
| 01:06:26.53 | Kristina Feller | Okay, Dan, can you take roll call? |
| 01:06:26.80 | Nastassya Saad | Thank you. |
| 01:06:26.82 | Dan | Thank you. Commissioner Graff. Yes. Commissioner Luxembourg. Yes. Commissioner Saad? Yeah. Mr. Genius. Yes. Chair Feller? |
| 01:06:40.84 | Kristina Feller | Yes. |
| 01:06:41.89 | Dan | Motion carries unanimously. |
| 01:06:43.86 | Kristina Feller | Great, thank you very much. with that, I don't think we have any other business items. So I will, um, make a motion to adjourn. |
| 01:06:55.59 | Richard Graef | something to put back on. or Thank you. I heard you. |
| 01:06:59.66 | Kristina Feller | All in favor. |
| 01:07:00.80 | Richard Graef | Hi. |
| 01:07:02.63 | Kristina Feller | Thank you. |
| 01:07:03.20 | Richard Graef | Thank you. |
| 01:07:03.22 | Dan | Thank you, everybody. Have a good night. |
| 01:07:05.66 | Richard Graef | Thank you, everybody. |
| 01:07:05.97 | Dan | Yeah. |
| 01:07:06.61 | Kristina Feller | Have a good evening. |